Category talk:OctoFamily

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia

After noticing the large amount of octorok related monsters I decided that if dragon and deku deserve a category octoroks deserve one too. Ganondox (U) (T) (C) 20:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Spelling

The title "OctoFamily" seems a bit unprofessional. Perhaps a better title would be "enemies related to the Octorok" or at least "Octo Family," because that at least has a space in between the two words. Ganondorfdude11 20:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree. OctoFamily is a little unprofessional, and we want to look as professional as possible to the readers.—Justin^(Talk) 20:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Maybe

...this is one of those things that would be a great addition to enemy navigation templating instead of a category. I'd say "Dragon" could hold it's own just because of Valoo-a non enemy dragon. Axiomist (talk) 03:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea, sort of like the slime template we already have. I'm not doubting the validity of this categorization. Octoroks have had numerous variations and relatives in the games. Ganondorfdude11 04:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough, I suppose we could have both until such a time we need to gut categories again (unlikely). Axiomist (talk) 04:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

We could delete the category once the template gets made, because then it would be redundant. I'm more in favor of the template. Ganondorfdude11 06:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Well the template is done, and placed on all of the pages categorized. And as always, it's unprotected in case anyone wants different images or other changes. I'll let others comment before deleting the category and uncategorizing the pages. Axiomist (talk) 08:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)