Talk:Metroid Prime

From Zelda Wiki.org

we wouldnt need wanted pages if jerks would stop makeing pages like this.Dragonstetraforce

Whoa, dude, calm down. It's been a policy for a while (although not exercised for the past year or so) that some Nintendo non-Zelda articles are allowed. I personally believe that we should just keep the ones that pertain to Zelda in some way (Animal Crossing, amongst others), but hey, not my policy. And what do you mean by "we wouldn't need wanted pages"??

Also, if you think something should be deleted, be sure to add {{delete}} to the top of that article as well as stating why on the talk page. It makes it easier for us to catch which pages should be deleted. —Ando (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

ANYONE WHO INSULTS SAMUS ARAN SHALL

DIE!!!

That aside, I thought the policy was that although this is mainly a Zelda Wiki (hence the title), any game involving Shigeru Miyamoto received a passing mention, and a full article should those games involve Link, Princess Zelda or maybe Ganondorf in some way. I'm not sure how we stand on the Captain Rainbow article, what with the biggest Zelda character being Crazy Tracy... --Felicia's Champion 23:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, the policy just states that "some general Nintendo content is allowed". It just happens to be that the old list of Miyamoto's works had a lot of other games on it, and so people thought "hey, those should be articles!". I don't know, perhaps the we should think about re-working that part of the policy? —Ando (talk) 00:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

If good Miyomoto had a hand in it, then I don't have a problem with having an article for it.—Matt ^(T C F S) 02:00, October 27, 2008 (UTC)

Or if we can find a legitimate way to tie it to Zelda, one would suppose?Axiomist (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Should this actually be deleted? I mean, if this is allowed, don't you think an article for the game Kirby would be necessary, or an article for the Pokemon games. I mean, Metroid does have some relation I suppose, but the material on this article seems quite useless. If it is kept, it should just be titled Metroid and not Metroid Prime. Mases 16:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I'd say keep it, but as Metroid(game) and dump the Metroid enemy article. Axiomist (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't think we should have it at all, it does not pertain to Zelda in anyway. The fact that a trailer for Prime was included on MQ is not an excuse to keep this article. Besides trailers for Wario World and F-Zero GX had trailers on the disc as well, and they don't have articles. It's one thing with Animal Crossing games, because they have quite a few Zelda references, but Metroid Prime has none.— Steve 13:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)