Hello[]
 |
Hi there, RupeeUL, and welcome to Zelda Wiki! Why not check out the community hub? To find out what's been going on recently at the wiki and what articles users are editing right now, head to the Recent Changes. For general wiki-related discussion and questions, head over to the Discussion Center. Also, for wiki usage and policy help, check out our Help Guide. We hope you enjoy the wiki. Thanks! — The Zelda Wiki Staff |
Theories[]
Hey there, RupeeUL. On behalf of the entire Zelda Wiki staff, welcome to the wiki!
One thing you should know, though, is that we at Zelda Wiki don't usually encourage theorizing in our main articles unless the theories have notable community backing. We do this in order to keep Zelda Wiki as factual as possible. So for example, on the Rupin page, instead of theorizing by saying "Rupin resembles the Happy Mask Salesman because they may be related", it would have been preferable to keep it to "Rupin resembles the Happy Mask Salesman", period. It's still an interesting observation, but it lets readers draw their own conclusions and keeps our wiki factual.
That being said, trivial observations (like the fact that Demise's Sword resembles Ganon's) are always welcome. We'd just rather you left out the "because" unless it's proven. In any case, you seem to be a talented writer, and so I hope to see more from you in the future! :) — Hylian King [*] 15:41, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
re: Theories[]
Thanks for your message. I am just wondering, what constitutes a page as a "main article" and not a main article? I do agree about the Rupin-Happy Mask Salesman theory being a bit redundant, but for example things like the Demise Sword, Levias-Windfish relation are very interesting things, not in any way fanfic level or something like that. These are all potentially very real hints that the developers left that link to other entries in the timeline.
RupeeUL 15:52, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
- To be completely honest, I have no problem with your theories. However, there are other users that aren't as tolerant of speculation. Hints? Maybe. But we can't know for sure, right? Logical speculation is still speculation. — Hylian King [*]