User talk:PsioniC

I don't mean to sound rude, but this is not the Zelda Legends Wiki. The system of subcategorizing every page by which game it appears in is overly complex, and also is useless unless it is implemented completely. At present, it has been approved at ZW.org only to subcategorise the Enemies and the new articles relating to PH. It has also been applied to certain games' locations, but beyond this we have ample Listings pages within each game page to make such new categories unnecessary. --Adam 10:54, 20 August 2007 (PDT)


 * No problem. I shall adhere to this in future. *continues copying his articles from Zelda Legends* I'm impressed that someone found, and is using my TWW images for the outset characters. Good work! --PsioniC 16:00, 20 August 2007 (PDT)


 * Thanks for understanding :) I really like the Zelda Legends wiki, the completed articles are very well written and in-depth. It's just a shame that it's inactive and unused; I'd been wanting to see some of the content migrated here for a while, but obviously I couldn't just copy it myself! --Adam 16:05, 20 August 2007 (PDT)


 * What about the overlap of the categories "Hyruleans" and "People"? --PsioniC 16:14, 20 August 2007 (PDT) (Oh I may eventually get the hang of this program!)


 * Aha! You've hit the nail on the head there; that's one of the main categorisation inconsistencies which needs to be fixed! The "problem" categories are:


 * Category:People
 * Category:Hyruleans
 * Category:Hylians
 * Category:Humans
 * One problem is that all articles relating to a sentient being of any kind (regardless of race) should be in the People category, which they are not. Also, due to people not understanding the distinction between Hylian and Hyrulean (i.e race and nationality) these categories are a mess. And then to add to the mess, there's the Humans category, which technically should contain everyone not classed as Sheikah, Gerudo, Hylian etc. Goes back to the problem I mentioned above about incomplete implementation of categories... it's really badly organized, feel free to standardise it if you dare! --Adam 23:42, 20 August 2007 (PDT)


 * Ah... ha... I'm going to go with "eep" on that one.--PsioniC 14:54, 21 August 2007 (PDT)