Talk:Relationship of Link and Zelda

"Note: Unlike LinkXZelda, this article is based on actual facts, instead of fan-based information"
THAT is NOT TRUE. I agree with Saibh, there is a lot of speculations on this page. There is nothing wrong with speculating, as long as you don't claim that those speculations are "actual facts" that is. Also, some of theese speculations are really vague like the ocarina of time-part where it says that "Link and Zelda seem to share a romantic moment at the end floating in the sky" (or something like that). I tried to put in something about the relationship that really was based on actual facts (based on information from nintendos official zelda site) but it got deleted, check the history page if you want to see it. What's wrong with this?! Sorry for being harsh but this is my oppinion and I'm sticking to it. --Olle93 00:21, 13 july 2009 (UTC)
 * And then there's that obviously non-cannon picture of Link and Zelda looking at each other in the Final Destination of SSBB... That seriously shouldn't be there, folks. Dany36 22:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah. Considering the whole Zelda/Link relationship theory was just that - a theory. There really is no way it could possibly be based on actual "facts". 07:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Zelda.com is notorious for providing fan fiction in its encyclopedia that directly contradicts the games themselves. Nothing on that website can be trusted. That's why those edits were removed. 08:02, July 13, 2009 (UTC)

Brawl picture
Er, I guess that's nice and all, but that was a picture made by a fan that was displayed on the DOJO!!, so I'm not sure exactly of its use, other than to look pretty. Saibh 23:32, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

Expansion
Since the name isn't "Romantic Relationship of Link and Zelda", I think the article should be expanded to include the platonic and possible familial bond of Link and Zelda. This is mostly just speculation anyway, so it should mainly comprise of their relationship as friends, and then discuss romance. It should also be noted that many fans think that Zelda and Link might be related, which should be addressed. Saibh 01:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I dunno
The part that said Zelda gasped every time link got hit......I mean would she not fear for his life if they werent doin it ( sorry for the crude version) but anyways unless someone can convince me otherwise im deleting that part....just feels like grasping for straws.--Remo 17:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Content from redirects talk page
This article is inappropriate in tone and content: Adam 14:33, 21 April 2007 (PDT)
 * Title is highly subjective and opinion-heavy
 * Unsuitable as a separate article, rather as a side note maybe within Link and/or Princess Zelda
 * Poorly written content, not in correct wiki style


 * True, but I don't think it should get deleted. It's a little better than those others that are in the 'Deletion' category. I think it should get edited, or combined with Link or Princess Zelda.

--Z.L 16:40, 24 April 2007 (PDT)Z.L


 * I'd say editing is out of the question to be honest. I think if an article such as this were to exist as a separate entity, it would need to be properly written (with sources and references cited) in an essay/opinion piece style. On a side note, the subject is already covered in part here: LinkXZelda
 * -Adam 09:20, 25 April 2007 (PDT)

Hm. Yeah, it should be deleted.--71.143.1.74 07:47, 26 April 2007 (PDT)Z.L

Ummm
Zybera: Uhhh is this fair? the other love intrests are barely noted. And, it is comonly exempted that this is the least likely love intrest.

Rewriting
I just finished editing a similar article over at zelda.wikia.com and was thinking about transferring some things here. I'm not sure about the policy on inter-wiki exchanges though. Can someone elaborate?


 * This should answer all your questions regarding inter-wiki relations. 05:13, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Hmm..
Yeah, this article focuses way more on the romantic side of Link and Zelda; the title of the article says 'Relatioship'. -.- Thus, an editing of the title should be in order?