Talk:Ancient Tribe

Um... I've never heard this Stone Tower theory in regards to the ancient tribe. If we're going to make a page about them, should it be seperated into what (very, very little) we KNOW to be true about them, and then put the theoretic portions after? No offense to the writers, but the evidence for this theory is terribly scanty at best. I don't think it's fair to stamp an entire article about a mentioned tribe with a theory tag. I mean the tribe isn't theoretical. The Stone Tower part is. Thoughts?? 03:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with this. I know the article has some theorical parts, but that doesn't mean that the whole page should be marked as a theory. Embyr, you did a great job on the Ikana Kingdom article in the matter of separating the facts from the theory on such a limited subject, so if you feel up to the task, then go for it. :) I'll do it if unless someone else beats me to it, but right now I'm on my phone, so....yeah :p Dany36 03:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Okidoke, I did my best, but anyone feel free to mulch it if it's sub-par. I still don't like the part about them being the opposing force in Ikana. I mean I pretty much thought that role was understood to be filled by the Garo, no? And no one said the Ancient Tribe was even from Termina... Any architecture/symbolism could've been put in place by the Skull Kid (I mean he warped the temples and filled them with evil bosses, right?) Anyway... just thinking out loud I guess. 03:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)