Category talk:Featured Templates

Would someone with the proper privileges please add the following templates to this category: The first two are currently protected and uncategorized. The second two are only uncategorized. I think one person should categorized all of them. I don't want to mess up anything.--Matt 23:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Template:Support
 * Template:Oppose
 * Template:Keep
 * Template:Disq


 * Done, sir (albeit with some trouble :P). --Ando 05:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Something like forgetting noinclude tags was what I hoped to avoid. Oh well. It's a laugh anyway. ^_^ --Matt 05:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * All the featured content voting pages look okay. Some of the templates have an extra line just before the opening noinclude tag. This really caused big problems with the elongated hyphen template.--Matt 05:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Not the ones that I did, though, right? I specifically tried to avoid that... --Ando 05:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think so. I'm not sure exactly which ones have this problem. But it is an easy mistake to make, so there is bound to be quite a few of them. I'll look around later today. that is, if you don't beat me to it. Ahh... it's 1:00 AM here. Need sleep. Later. ^_^ --Matt 06:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Awesome. Sounds go-- wait. It's 1:00 am here, too. Are you following me or something --Ando 06:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Possibility. I'm not sure. One can never tell when awake for twenty hours :P. Sleeeepppp.... --Matt 06:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

One last thought before I doze off. We could make a template. It could be like this:

And it would put out:

The Legend of Zelda: 

That would seem to save a little bit of space. Considering all the links that would save a lot of space. But crap, that is a butt-load of work. It take weeks, months even. I'm not sure how helpful this suggestion is right now. Such is the result of the lack of sleep.--Matt 06:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, ALL that would do is save some space... But we're already struggling to get everyone to use the piped links; suddenly switching to a template like that would possibly be catastrophic. :P Noble idea, but I can't see its integration working very well. --Ando 16:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, that is lack of sleep for you. We don't have to change every single game link to the template form. We could just do some here and there. It would catch on eventually. —Matt 16:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)