Talk:Command

I promise, this page is nearly the exact same as Playable Secondary Characters, though less complete. Why do we have two pages saying the same thing? 21:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow. That's a good point. I would like to see these two merged into one considering they are...well, pretty much the same thing. Thoughts? 21:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I looked at the two articles and, really, we won't need to merge anything about the characters themselves, as the other page describes them in WAY more detail. I'll work on creating a new intro, one that merges the two pages well. (and I won't apply it to the page) 21:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, so are we going to merge the pages? Or just keep them as they are? 17:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * We need some more input on this. I keep posting it in the Skype chat and telling people to post their thoughts. We can't be hasty about merges or splits. 18:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think more than anything the Command page just needs to be rewritten. More focus needs to be given on how Link is able to command, like by elaborating on the "indirect" and "direct" commands mentioned in the lead paragraph (that's one thing that this article has that Playable Characters does not), and what commanding enables Link to do. The rest can be left to the Playable Characters article. Essentially, the Command page would cover the "how" and the "why", while Playable Secondary Characters would cover the "who", "what" and "where" (as it pretty much does already). The articles have the potential to complement each other as opposed to being redundant, so for that reason I'm opposing a merge for now. If it gets rewritten and we're still no better off, then I'll be OK with a merge. 17:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll work on this page and see what I can do. 17:16, 9 December 2012 (This edit was not harmful. The Wiki repeated my addition of my sig)