Community talk:Capn vs Jew

Can the picture, File:TheTease.gif, be deleted please? It's full pornography. According to Adam, ZW.org is moderated, a moderated site would not allow a picture like that.--Link hero of light 22:27, 25 March 2008 (EDT)


 * The article has both Capn's and Jason's blessing. They both thought it was (and I quote) "loltastic". The image is about as pornographic as artwork of Telma or the Great Fairy, so your logic kind of falls flat. Also, this is community fun and you're ruining it. Again. Please stop. --Uncle Meat 07:45, 26 March 2008 (EDT)

I'm not ruining anything, I never asked for the article to be deleted, just for a single picture to be removed. It was quite diffrent with this. And the pictures of Telma and Great fairy are important to the article, this picture is not.--Link hero of light 10:43, 26 March 2008 (EDT)


 * Look, it's just like the last time you asked for something fun to be removed. The picture is not offensive, it's not pornographic, you won't find it unless you're looking for it, and if you are, you know what to expect: a good laugh. This picture is very important to the article. It's witty commentary on the community created by the community. I'd admit that you had a point if there was actual nudity in the picture, but there isn't. --Uncle Meat 12:17, 26 March 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, it IS pornographic. Telma and the Great Fairy are pornographic as well =| And don't say "WELL WHO ASKED YOU!?"

Did you read what I said above, Telma and the great fairy are important to the article, that picture is not. I don't mind the picture itself, it's the movement that bothers me. And the picture that say "Zelda f---ing universe is mine" is just as bad, is strong language realy needed?--Link hero of light 03:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * @ Link; this discussion has been had before. If you don't like the tone or content of the community articles, don't read them. They've been here longer than you.


 * @ Link & Mccool; to call this pornographic is to stretch the definition. It would be better described as vulgar/smutty. And it only moves if you click on it to view full size, indicating a desire to access such content :) —Adam (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

But is it nessesary? Is it nessesary to have a picture like that. Give me one good reason why it is nessesary and I won't bother you about comunity articles ever again (unless of course, it contains something that would belong in a rated R or NG-17 movie). And by the way, telling me that the community article were here before I was was kinda pointless. They've been here longer than you too.--Link hero of light 00:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * They have been here longer than me, but then I'm not the one complaining ;) And is the image any more or less necessary than the one found here: Original Intarweb Moments? I think you're missing the point that what this article describes was an April's Fool joke, and one in fairly bad taste. The images were a major component of the joke, hence they're shown here. I think you need to realise that, since the only ones here who can delete content are sysops and admins, and all of them support the community articles, you're never going to get anything like this deleted. —Adam (talk) 06:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * <3 —Uncle Meat 16:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)