Talk:Plok!

I'm not too sure what this has to do with ZeldaWiki. Could someone explain? BlackEye Falcon 10:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, we've always allowed non-Zelda Nintendo articles to be made (as long as people don't go overboard with it); see also: Zelda Wiki:Guidelines for Nintendo Articles. 02:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * But it has absolutely nothing to do with Zelda. I mean, I'm amazed Captain Rainbow qualifies for its own article because it has a character who appeared in one game, rather than a mention in a Trivia section or something, but this... Jimbo Jambo 17:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Jimbo Jambo I think that this article is a bit rediculus! Scattergories 18:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC-7)


 * How could this article stand here so long? How could I miss this? This is nonsense. This should never have been created. This does qualify as overboard Ando. This has nothing to do with Zelda at all. This is no different than if I made a page for Star Wars: Battle for Naboo just because it is a N64 game. Nonsense. Completely irrelevant. 08:51, February 13, 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Matt here, this page is irrelevant and therefore not important to us. It has nothing to do with any Zelda article, it needs deleted. 09:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I never commented on this precisely because nobody else seemed to care about it. Now that it's in the open like this, I see no point in keeping this article. Unless it links to Zelda in some way, it really should go... --Felicia&#39;s Champion 11:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Really? Any non Zelda Nintendo game? I'm up for that, Beyond Good and Evil actually uses the WW engine and I think a Harry Potter game uses the OoT engine. Stuff like that could get a page to scratch the surface of documenting the actual mechanics of Zelda titles. 15:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I say this is consensus enough to delete. 07:11, February 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * How about the other articles in Category:Other Games? Jimbo Jambo 23:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * This should be deleted, but I think some of the others should stay, and like I said above Games related to Zelda by core mechanics should have a page overviewing it and how it ties to Zelda games. 23:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I dunno. You think a game would deserve its own article simply because it uses the same engine as one of the games, rather than just a mention in the trivia of said game's article? Also, what about games with references to Zelda, like Animal Crossing? Jimbo Jambo 02:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)