Template talk:Size

Nice choice of picture, Matt. =) 21:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Template Change
What I did, Matt, was an implementation of extra code that would enable a user to direct attention to specifically what part of the article was in dire need of cleanup, instead of a vague "improve as you see fit" as the template originally promoted. Either way, its not life-changing, but it may help to focus attention to a certain overweight section, instead of mindlessly hacking the entire article "as they see fit". Either way, its cool though. =) 17:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

No
Matt, you do not get to arbitrarily change the usage of a template that I personally requested specifically for as I have been using it. I'm protecting the template and restoring it to where I've been using it. Watch it. --Xizor 04:15, 14 September 2010 (EDT)


 * I didn't. The admin staff told me it was okay. It wasn't arbitrary. 08:50, September 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * What "Admin Staff"? You mean one admin? I'm not going to get into you about the Staff Dynamic. Hell, you know about it. It takes more than one or two admins to OVERRULE a Bureaucrat or another Admin. I have raised these issues with the rest of the staff where they will all be able to see and discuss it. I'm telling you this so you don't think I'm just romping around stamping my feet and acting like a rogue warrior. --Xizor 05:04, 14 September 2010 (EDT)