Talk:Transformation

Already here?
We have a category for this already. 22:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll repeat what Matt said, since I believe he has a good point:


 * I don’t see the harm in having a page. It’s a bit better than having a category. Categories really aren’t that pretty or user-friendly. And not something you want to cover a topic with.


 * I was also thinking of redirecting it to the category page, but...I think Matt's right, so I left it as that. This could become a rather awesome page with enough work. :) Dany36 22:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't see the point in really making another page... That's the same as combining the Ocean King's servants into one page... It's pointless and I don't see much you could add onto the 'A Link to the Past''. 22:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, already here >=D
Well, I have expanded this article, hopefully WolfLink's intentions will not be in vain after all. My phylosophy as an editor from ZW is to Add, reorganize, expand and/or modify articles or sections as a plan A, so I had that in mind with this article. besides, Yusei, according to your (frankly ambiguous) logic, articles like this, this or even THIS would be useless as well (although you're free to believe whatever you want, as long as you don't disrupt articles just to illustrate a point). The idea in these cases is to provide a brief definition of the subject, since there are terms and conventions that are worth being conceptually covered in separate articles.--K2L 01:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm just unhappy with the title. "Transformations" is too inclusive and could seek even Boss Transformations, Geographic Transformations, etc etc etc... I did once want to have a page for Link's Transformations but found the category and was satisfied with that. I don't recommend merging every thing into here. I see it as an overview and the links to the respective articles should remain present as "Main Article: here" styled links which indicate that this isn't the full story. 10:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Mmm, you do have a valid point, even if the lead section of the article clarifies that it's about Link's shapeshifting. How about renaming the article as "List of Link's Transformations" or "Shapeshifting Gameplay"? What can be done as well is to add a not at the top:


 * This article is about Link's alternate forms in the Zelda series. For Hyrule's geographical changes, see here. For Ganon's shapeshifting, see Puppet Ganon and here.


 * And seeing as most bosses in the series don't actually transform, the reader might want to refer to their respective articles. --K2L 02:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)